Posted in

What is the force control function of a robot controller?

If you’ve ever watched a robot arm flip a burger on a commercial grill, tuck a seam on a car body, or pack fragile glass bottles into a box without crushing them, you’ve seen force control in action. But if you’re deep in industrial automation—whether you’re a plant manager tuning line efficiency or a fellow robot controller vendor—you might’ve wondered: what exactly is this “force control” stuff, and why does it matter way more than just basic position control? Robot Controller

Let me break this down like I explain it to my engineering team at the controller shop. Forget the jargon for a second. Every robot moves in two main ways: you can tell it “move to X, Y, Z coordinates” (that’s position control), or you can tell it “apply a specific amount of force on this surface” (that’s force control). The controller’s job here is to adjust the robot’s movement in real time so it doesn’t miss its target position and doesn’t apply too much—or too little—force while doing it.

Most of the time, basic position control works. If you’re grabbing a metal part off a conveyor, you just need the gripper to close until it’s at a set X and Y point. But when you’re doing something that involves touching, bending, fitting, or pressing, position control falls flat. Imagine a robot tasked with inserting a gear into a shaft. If the hole’s off by even a millimeter, the robot will either crash into the shaft (bending the gear or breaking the gripper) or not press hard enough to get it seated. Force control fixes that by letting the robot “feel” the surface, adjust its force, and move only when the fit is right.

Here’s where my side of the table comes in: as a robot controller supplier, the force control function isn’t just a feature—it’s the thing that separates a generic controller from one that actually moves the needle for my customers. Let me walk through how that works in practice, because I’ve had clients come to me with horror stories from cheap controllers that can’t pull this off.

Take a packaging line client last year. They were trying to pack 500ml glass juice bottles into cardboard trays. A basic position-controlled robot would lower the gripper, close at a set position, and lift. But half the time, the gripper would squeeze too hard, shattering the bottle, or too soft, and the bottle would slip out mid-transport. We swapped their old controller with ours, which has built-in dynamic force control, and the defect rate dropped from 12% to under 1% in a week. That’s not a small win—for a line packing 10,000 bottles a day, that’s 1,200 fewer broken products and $4,000 a month in savings, easy.

How does the controller pull that off? Let’s get a little technical (but not the boring kind). Every robot joint has sensors—usually torque sensors, sometimes encoder feedback that calculates force indirectly. The controller reads those sensor values 100 times a second (that’s the loop rate, and if your controller’s loop rate is less than 50Hz, it’s not doing force control right) and compares it to the desired force setpoint. If the force is too high, it slows the gripper’s closing; too low, it speeds up a touch. It’s like how you grip a wine glass gently but firmly enough not to drop it—except the robot does this without getting tired, 24/7, and adjusts for tiny variations in the glass’s shape or weight.

Wait, but force control isn’t just for grippers. I’ve had automotive clients use our controller’s force control for body-in-white assembly—specifically, the spot welds that hold door panels to the frame. Position control would weld too close to a window seal, breaking it, or too far, leaving a gap. Our controller lets them set a force limit of 150N when the weld tip touches the panel, so the robot stops approaching before it damages the seal. It’s also used for sanding and polishing: a robot with a sanding tool can apply a consistent 20N of force, no matter how uneven the curved metal surface is. Without that, you’d have some spots over-sanded (thin metal that rusts) and some under-sanded (rough edges that fail inspections).

A lot of newer automation people mix up force control with “compliance,” but compliance is just the robot bending when it hits something. Force control is the controller actively adjusting movement to maintain a set force. That’s the key difference. A cheap controller might have passive compliance, where the robot just has a spring in the joint that bends when it hits an object. But that works for only the simplest tasks. If you’re inserting a pin into a tight hole, passive compliance can’t adjust the force fast enough—you need the controller calculating in real time to nudge the pin until it fits.

Here’s the part that matters for my customers (and why our controller is different): we don’t force our clients to write custom code to get force control working. A lot of older controllers require you to mess with PID loops, filter sensor data, and calibrate force before every run—something that takes a seasoned engineer an hour to do. Our force control function has a built-in wizard: you just set the desired force, pick the task (insert, sand, grip), and the controller auto-tunes everything. That’s a big deal for small to medium manufacturers who don’t have a full robotics team on staff. They don’t have time to troubleshoot force control issues every morning when the line goes down.

I’ve also seen clients go with big-name robot controllers that bloat force control with unnecessary features—extra licenses, cloud integrations they don’t need, or overcomplicated settings that make it hard to adjust mid-shift. For a company that runs three shifts, where operators need to tweak force for a new product run in 2 minutes, that’s a nightmare. Our controller strips out the fluff, so the force control is reliable, lightweight, and easy to access from the teach pendant right at the robot cell.

Let’s talk about common pain points too, because that’s what we built our force control function to solve. One of the biggest ones is drift: over time, torque sensors can give off slightly off readings, so the robot thinks it’s applying 10N when it’s really 15N. Cheap controllers don’t have built-in drift correction, so your line slowly gets more broken parts as the sensors drift. Our controller does automatic calibration every time the robot homes, so drift is corrected without anyone having to do a manual check. Another pain point is latency: if the controller takes 20ms to react to a force change, that’s too slow for fast tasks like high-speed packaging. Our loop rate is 1kHz, so reaction time is 1ms—fast enough to keep up with lines running 100+ products a minute.

Wait, let’s test this with a real example from a food and beverage client. They make frozen pizza trays, and the robot has to place the pizza dough onto the tray without deflating it. A few years back, they used position control, and the robot would slam the dough down with 50N of force, squishing it into a thin pancake. They tried adding a pressure mat on the tray to trigger the robot to slow down, but that added wiring and broke all the time in a freezer environment. We swapped the controller, set a force limit of 10N when the dough touches the tray, and now the robot lowers slowly, applies exactly 10N, and lifts. The dough’s rise rate went up 25%, which means more finished pizzas per day. That’s not just a feature win—that’s revenue.

I get asked all the time: “Do I really need force control? Can’t I just stick to position control?” For small, repetitive tasks, sure. If you’re moving a box that’s identical every single time, position control works fine. But if your line deals with any part variation, any soft material, any assembly that requires “fitting” instead of just “placing,” force control is non-negotiable. And that’s where our controller shines: we built our force control function to be accessible, reliable, and tailored to the needs of manufacturers who don’t want to be held hostage by big robotics vendors.

Another thing to note: force control also helps with robot safety. If a robot’s gripper hits a human hand (or a random offcut of metal left on the line), the controller detects a sudden spike in force and shuts the robot down immediately. That’s way faster than a hard-coded position-based safety stop, which would just keep moving until it hits the set coordinate. We’ve had clients use that feature to cut their safety incident response time by 70%, which translates to less downtime and lower insurance costs.

Let me wrap this up without the salesy stuff, because I hate when blogs turn into ads. The force control function of a robot controller is, at its core, what makes a robot capable of interacting with the world instead of just moving through it. It’s the difference between a robot that can only do pre-programmed pick-and-place, and one that can adapt to the tiny, messy variables that come with real manufacturing. As a controller vendor, we built our force control to solve the exact headaches I’ve seen clients deal with for years: too much downtime, too much calibration, too much jargon to use it.

If you’re running a line that’s dealing with broken parts, inconsistent fit, or slow changeovers because your current controller can’t handle force control, we can help. We work with teams of all sizes, from small bakeries automating packaging to big auto plants upgrading assembly lines. No fancy sales pitches, no overcomplicated contracts—just a controller that works when you need it to. If you’re looking to upgrade your robot controller to get better force control, reach out to us to learn more.

Hotel Delivery Robot References:

  1. Craig, J. J. (2005). Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.
  2. Robotic Industries Association. (2022). Industrial Robot Force Control Applications and Best Practices.
  3. Wang, H., & Zhang, L. (2020). Real-Time Force Control for Industrial Manipulators: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 36(4), 1021-1038.
  4. International Organization for Standardization. (2019). ISO 10218-1: Robots and robotic devices – Safety requirements for industrial robots – Part 1: Robots.
  5. Industrial Automation World. (2021). “Force Control: The Unsung Hero of Modern Robotics.” Industry Brief.

Hangzhou Janz Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.
As one of the most professional robot controller manufacturers and suppliers in China, we offer a wide range of products with superior quality. Please feel free to buy advanced robot controller at competitive price from our factory. Contact us for quotation.
Address: Room 240, 2nd Floor, 289-16, Creative Road, Yinhu Street, Fuyang District, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province
E-mail: amy@hzjanz.com
WebSite: https://www.simplexrobots.com/